Category Archives: Planning Applications

Brook House conversion saga continues

The redevelopment of Brook House for flats is proving to be a serious concern for all those who love Mitcham Cricket Green Conservation Area.

When finished there will be nearly 50 new flats and they are already being marketed as far away as Hong Kong.

The principle of converting the building from offices to flats isn’t something Merton Council or we can do anything about. The Government has introduced new freedoms which allow this to happen without needing a planning application. But there is a great deal that can be done to reduce its impact.

In the work done so far the developer has shown little respect for either the local community or the prominent location at the heart of Mitcham Cricket Green Conservation Area and fronting the oldest cricket ground in the world.

brook-house-substation-161113A large substation has been erected without consent in the most prominent and unacceptable location, the historic Cold Blows footpath has been damaged, trees have been threatened, not least through the digging of destructive trenches that have been lined with metal, and the sensitive roots of mature trees being left exposed to frost. Spoil has been left and a floodlight erected.

Much of this unauthorised activity has taken place on public land as well as that within the site curtilage.

Now we are faced with an application for claimed “minor works” such as a substation, bin store, access gate, railing and external lighting.

Each of these is anything but minor given the location and has the potential to have a significant and negative impact on the Conservation Area where new development must by law “preserve or enhance” its character.

Yet the information provided with the application provides next to no information on any of the different “minor works” cited.

The application also fails to include details of the tree works that have been undertaken, without authorisation, on the site.

A further omission is the intrusive white street cabinet erected on green space in front of Brook House. This has been erected as a result of the residential demand which will result from Brook House’s conversion. We are unaware of any prior notification for this cabinet or that permission has been given. It should be relocated to the rear of the building and more appropriately coloured – this is within Merton Council’s power under the prior notification procedures.

We believe the information provided with this application falls well below the standard required, especially in a Conservation Area, and we believe the application is not fit to be determined.

As a result the application should be refused unless further information is provided and the application is re-advertised.

Looking ahead, we acknowledge that this development will be proceeding and ask that it:

  • Respects the key frontage to Cricket Green
  • Relocates the substation erected without permission in the most intrusive location facing Cricket Green to the rear of the site
  • Relocates the street cabinet to the rear of the site
  • Avoids anything but muted external lighting
  • Provides boundary treatments that respect the open character of the existing frontage to Cricket Green
  • Retains existing trees and ensure there is no further damage to them during construction and into the future
  • Presents a clear planting plan, specifying the species and location of plants and hedges and how they will be maintained in perpetuity.

Find out more about this development here and read our response brook-house-nov-16

226 London Road planning application – our comments

One of the little explored pieces of Mitcham’s history is the Holborn Workhouse on London Road.

This covered a large site including that adjacent to Mitcham’s gem – the Grade I listed Eagle House.

The last remaining building is locally listed.

There have been a number of development proposals over the years and the latest is about to be decided.

It involves partial demolition of the locally listed building and its conversion into one bedroom flats along with a large new block of flats.

The previous scheme received a red rating from Merton’s Design Review Panel and we are not convinced the latest proposals are much better. They are too large for the site and do not pay enough respect to the setting of Eagle House or its historic walls.

You can find details of the plans here and read our response- 226-london-road-redevelopment-nov-16.

39 Mitcham Park – why we want enforcement action

39-mitcham-park-constructionThe latest proposals involving 39 Mitcham Park provide the clearest example of why it is important for Merton Council to resource and prioritise enforcement action.

The former ballet school is one of a number of fine houses in this important part of the Conservation Area.

Without any permission the owners have clear trees from the garden, built an incongruous two storey extension, paved over the front, installed wholly inappropriate windows and kitted out the house to be used for flats.

Planning permission was refused back in May for converting it to flats and now we have a new application seeking to get permission  for the extension over a year after it was built.

Enough is enough.

We are asking Merton Council to give the latest application short shrift and to take urgent enforcement action that requires the owners to demolish the extension, restore the house and replant the trees.

Our comments mitcham-park-39-october-2016

Register your own views at Merton Council’s web site

Date Valley School shelter – our comments on planning application

Date Valley School continues to be a challenging neighbour for Cricket Green.

There are continuing problems over parking and traffic in breach of the school’s travel plan and questions over its use of the green space adjacent to the cricket pitch.

It has also been in breach of planning controls by erecting a shelter without planning permission that Merton Council has said needs to be removed because of its impact on the Conservation Area.

A new shelter has been proposed which is significantly lower than the current one.

We believe it will still have a negative impact but recognise the school’s need and have not objected. We are asking Merton Council to ensure that it is an appropriate colour which will blend with its surroundings in this sensitive location.

Our comments – Date Valley shelter – revised July 16

Full details of the planning application at Merton Council’s web site

How to make your own comments on a planning application

Ravensbury Arms development – our comments on planning application

The Ravensbury Arms is an important community asset and we have welcomed recent investment following a long period of closure.

It is all the more disappointing, therefore, to report proposals for development on the site which will damage Metropolitan Open Land.

We have strongly objected to plans to erect eight timber “shisha cabins”, each with their own television and lighting. These are located in the green land alongside the existing pub. This is designated as Metropolitan Open Land which gives it the same protection as Green Belt and where inappropriate development can only be permitted in “very special circumstances”.

The site is visually part of Mitcham Common, wooded and adjacent to the golf course.

Our comments – Ravensbury Arms – shisha cabins July 16

Full details of the planning application at Merton Council’s web site

How to make your own comments on a planning application

Parish Hall at St Peter and Paul Roman Catholic Church – our response to planning application

Mitcham Catholic Church has brought forward new plans for a large parish hall on open land to the rear.

A single storey building over 4m high is proposed and it would take up a significant area of green space and involve the loss of some trees.

Nevertheless, we have supported the development subject to tight controls over noise, light pollution and design detail.  We have also asked Merton Council to ensure replacement trees are provided and asked that the new hall be available to everyone in the Mitcham community.

The church’s “Building for the Lord” appeal has already raised over £100k for the new building.

You can read our full response Peter & Paul Church – parish hall Jun 16