Fair Green canopy gets thumbs down from Design Review Panel

Last night (31 October) we attended Merton’s Design Review Panel.

This committee includes architects and others who know about building design. Its role is to look at planning applications, either before they are lodged with the council or while they are live, and give guidance on their design quality.

On 31 October it looked, for the second time, at the proposals for a canopy for Mitcham market at Fair Green. This has been put forward by Merton Council as part of a much wider range of plans under the umbrella of Rediscover Mitcham.

Seen it all before

The Design Review Panel had seen the market canopy before – in July. At that time the canopy had not been formally submitted as a planning application – it was in the ‘pre application’ phase, and the Design Review Panel meeting was in private.

Its notes were only published after the canopy became a live planning application, and only made available with the other materials relevant to the planning application after we had put in a Freedom of Information request.

Meeting in public

This time, because the canopy is now a live planning application, the Design Review Panel met in public. People were allowed to attend and observe – but not to speak. We had a representative at the meeting, and we can tell you what we heard.

Note as you read what follows that the official report is not yet published. It has to be written up by an officer of the council and then approved by the panel members.

What the Design Review Panel said

As you read our report of what the Design Review Panel said, bear in mind that it gives every application it considers a rating – green, amber or red. Green is good. No application wants to be rated red. Last time the market canopy got an amber rating.

These are some of the key points we heard at the meeting:

  • This is a building being made by the local authority and should be to the highest standard to set an example for others. It is far from being a high standard building.
  • The use of polycarbonate (a type of plastic) for the roof is a bad idea. It ages quickly – about ten years was suggested, and is not suited to permanent structures.
  • The buildings at Fair Green surrounding the market space are generally of a low architectural standard, and this new one would do nothing to change that – one person used the word ‘shed’ to describe it, another said it looked like ‘a cheap bus shelter’, another that it was going to get ‘tatty’.

Despite being invited by the chair to say something positive about the canopy and to offer constructive support for the design, nobody on the panel seemed to have a good word for it.

The canopy was given a red rating.

What next?

We hope the notes of the Design review Panel meeting are written up fast, because the next step for the canopy is the Planning Applications Committee on 7 November

We think it is vital that all the Councillors on the Planning Applications Committee see the full report to help inform its decision.

As things currently stand, Merton’s Officers have recommended to allow the canopy. Their own report on the planning application was published before the Design Review Panel met. We think this shows complete disregard for the panel. The officers report was also published before the deadline for all public comments, showing disregard for what the public say too.

All this has happened, we think, because Officers want to rush the canopy through the planning system so they can spend the money to build it by the deadline that’s been imposed by the external funding source.

The shortage of time does not, in our mind, excuse bad practice, and we have taken our concerns up at the highest level within the council. Just as a member of the Design Review Panel said council builds should be of the highest quality, we believe council planning applications should be dealt with to the highest standards, and Merton council has fallen well short.

Still time to comment

Although the official deadline for comments is 1 November, Merton council does tend to accept comments made after that, so if you feel strongly after reading this you may still contact the council and make your views known – but be quick as the planning committee meets on 7 November.

All the information you need on how to do this is at Merton Council’s web site, and the planning application number is 13/P2575.

Merton Community Plan launched – we’re proud to be featured

Merton has launched its new Community Plan. This is the overarching strategic plan of the Merton Partnership. It sets out the partnership’s long term vision and priorities for the borough up until 2019.

The magazine style publication presents the results of research into what people want to see in Merton, and looks at the work of various organisations and individuals, highlighting how voluntary and community activity benefits the whole borough.

We’re delighted that Mitcham Cricket Green Community and Heritage has a slot on the page that’s specifically about Mitcham.

You can download the full community plan for yourself from Merton Council’s web site.

MCGC&H in Community Plan Merton Community Plan cover

Why we are objecting to a canopy on Fair Green

We have put in a formal objection to Merton Council’s plans for a large canopy on Fair Green.

This is one of a number of developments planned for Fair Green over the coming months as part of the Rediscover Mitcham programme.

It is shocking that this application has been submitted before the Rediscover Mitcham plans have been formally agreed by the Council.

We have also asked Merton’s planners to reject it on the grounds of the lack of detail in the documents that make up the planning application.

We also think that it is wrong to consider one part of a much wider set of proposals in isolation from all the rest.

The proposed structure is unduly intrusive, poorly designed and over-size.  It would cause significant harm to the valued and historic open space of Fair Green.

We have seen no evidence that Merton Council will invest in long term maintenance and fear extra costs will fall on market traders. The canopy also risks becoming a place for rough sleeping and anti-social behaviour.

We believe the focus should be on an alternative strategy which invests in the existing market and local businesses through grassroots community activity that will meet the desired objectives for regenerating Mitcham town centre more effectively.

Read our response in full

Our comments on plans for 3m wide cycle track along Wandle

In late June we attended a consultation in Poulter Park about putting a wide cycle track along the stretch of the Wandle that runs along Poulter Park.

The plan fits in with ideas about more work all along the Wandle Trail, and there’s been a big funding boost recently with £2 million granted from the Heritage Lottery Fund. There’s going to be a big launch of the Living Wandle Landscape Partnership that will administer this grant, and a celebration of the projects planned, at Morden Hall Park on 29th September. Information is at www.wandlevalleypark.co.uk.

The consultation we attended was for a piece of work funded outside this larger grant, and was managed by Sustrans, who would be doing the work if it gets approved.

A report of the consultation has been published, but sadly we find the report to be inadequate. We made a formal written representation, and while this is referred to in the consultation report, it has not been published in full.

So we are publishing our comments here.

We’re also publishing a drawing of the plans.

Our latest newsletter

We’ve published our Autumn 2013 Bulletin.

Read it to learn more about:

  • Why the willow at the Canons carp pond has gone
  • How we are contributing to the Merton Memories project
  • Why we are objecting to floodlit sports pitches at the Canons and how you can get involved (also see our web site post)
  • A new addition to the Cricket Green Conservation Area
  • Opening the Cricket Pavilion for London Open House on 21 September (also see our web site post)
  • And much more!

MCGCH newsletter Autumn 2013

A busy week in planning

It’s been a busy week for us in terms of planning applications and we have submitted three documents to Merton Council.

Sites and policies plan

The sites and policies plan is an extremely important document. It contains all Merton’s planning policies that will be used in the assessment of planning applications in the borough once it has been adopted. It also identifies sites for redevelopment between 2014 and 2024.

The plan has been available for public comment and a final draft will be produced and submitted to the Secretary of State for scrutiny by the end of September. in December there will be a public hearing by a planning inspector to examine the plans. The inspector will report in early 2014 with the final version being adopted by the council and put into general use some time during next year.

You can see the document for yourself and register to be kept informed of meeting dates at Merton Council’s web site here.

You can read our comments here.

18 Commonside West

You may recall that a plan to demolish a bungalow on Commonside West and replace it with houses was turned down by the Council.

The developers returned with a new proposal and while we did not object in principle we found some aspects, including having balconies on the front of the houses, unacceptable.

Balconies easily and understandably become full of ‘clutter’ which could negatively affect the views of this important strand of homes in the Cricket Green Conservation Area from across Three Kings Piece.

The developers have revised their plans and made adjustments to the balconies. You can read our comments on the revised plans here.

Mcmillan Williams, 8 & 10 Cricket Green

We were shocked and surprised when Mcmillan Williams Solicitors on Cricket Green tore the original (1830s) windows out of their locally listed offices facing onto Cricket Green without having applied for permission to do so. The windows were replaced with modern windows totally out of keeping with the building.

We contacted the Enforcement Officer at Merton Council, and Mcmillan Williams Solicitors has applied for planning permission to replace the windows it recently put in with new ones restoring them to a faithful replication of the original.

You can read our comments on their application here.